Clear boundaries. Clear expectations.

The target platform includes both. External attacks are constrained through controls on the organisation's side; an internal agent undergoes a check of its specific action before execution. Coverage depends on actually deployed paths and supported integrations.

It is designed to respond through bounded, explicitly authorised actions, automatically or with approval according to policy. After an action it verifies the effect and the service state. Monitoring alone does not mean prevention is enabled.

Prizma connects its own sensors and controls with selected existing systems. Deployment specifies who enforces each action, which version is supported and what remains the customer's responsibility. It does not assume replacement of the entire existing security stack.

Authority does not depend on behavioral speed or an “AI” label. The target control binds the issuer, task, tool, data and actual execution. Delegation, notes and restarts neither expand approved scope nor reset revocation or shared consumption.

Continuity includes limited privileges, consequence checks, independent monitoring and a channel for constraining Prizma's response. Recovery is planned with responsible people and the customer's infrastructure. No software can promise uninterrupted operation independently of its environment.

We start with an essential business service or AI task in your organisation. Together, we define the data to protect, permitted actions and connections to your existing systems.

The deployment plan specifies the protection scope, integrations, responsibilities and support. Each agreed workflow has verification criteria: whether the restriction takes effect and legitimate work can continue.

No. The model, execution location and capacity depend on privacy, task and workload. Infrastructure for our development and code assessment is not automatically a requirement for each customer installation.

The target platform includes post-quantum readiness: cryptographic dependencies, supported migration and verification of named connections. This is a different problem from stopping access misuse. Post-quantum cryptography runs on ordinary computers; protection depends on protocols, both endpoints and key management. Separate research into quantum algorithms for response selection remains exploratory and does not establish an advantage.